French constitutional authority rejects law forcing online platforms to delete hate-speech content

http://dominoqqforum.com/showthread.php?tid=131860

http://asusbr.com/forum/showthread.php?tid=285443

http://taxiforums.net/showthread.php?tid=16147

http://www.kadimkrallik.com/forum/thread-95-post-71609.html#pid71609

https://forum.taskforcehusky.co.uk/thread-168512.html

https://www.arcadesdcafe.com/viewtopic.php?t=418467

https://www.arcadesdcafe.com/viewtopic.php?t=418749

French regulation on hate speech on online platforms has been widely deemed as unconstitutional by France’s Constitutional Council, the top authority in charge of ruling whether a new law complies with the constitution. It won’t come into effect as expected in the coming weeks.

As a reminder, the original law said that online platforms should remove within 24 hours illicit content that has been flagged. Otherwise, companies will have to pay hefty fines every time they infringe the law. For social media companies, it could have potentially cost them many millions of dollars per year.

Illicit content means anything that would be considered as an offense or a crime in the offline world, such as death threats, discrimination, Holocaust denial… The list of illicit content consists of what is more broadly called hate speech.

https://www.arcadesdcafe.com/viewtopic.php?t=129222

https://www.arcadesdcafe.com/viewtopic.php?t=142263

https://www.arcadesdcafe.com/viewtopic.php?t=142266

https://www.arcadesdcafe.com/viewtopic.php?t=14046

https://www.arcadesdcafe.com/viewtopic.php?t=142264

http://fireblade.ru/index.php?showtopic=41826

http://fireblade.ru/index.php?showtopic=1874

http://fireblade.ru/index.php?showtopic=41920

http://fireblade.ru/index.php?showtopic=41922

http://colorado4wheel.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=65324

http://colorado4wheel.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=81822

http://colorado4wheel.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=81026

http://colorado4wheel.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=89244

http://colorado4wheel.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=15&view=next

http://colorado4wheel.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=15&view=previous

http://colorado4wheel.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=39&view=next

http://prosotic.be/forum/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=109903

http://prosotic.be/forum/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=109879

http://prosotic.be/forum/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=109858

But the Constitutional Council says that such a technical list makes it difficult to rule what is illicit content and what is not. Due to the short window of time, online platforms can’t check with a court whether a tweet, a post, a photo or a blog post is deemed as illicit or not.

When you combine that with potential fines, the Constitutional Council fears that online platforms will censor content a bit too quickly.

“Given the difficulties to rule whether flagged content is evidently illicit, the incurred penalty with the first violation […], the impugned provisions can only encourage online platform providers to remove content that is flagged, whether it is evidently illicit or not,” the Constitutional Council writes.

As you may have guessed, over-censoring content infringes freedom of speech.

http://prosotic.be/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=94472

http://prosotic.be/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=94685

http://prosotic.be/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=91268

http://prosotic.be/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=33436

http://welcome2solutions.com/forum/topics.aspx?ID=25861

http://welcome2solutions.com/forum/topics.aspx?ID=24893

http://welcome2solutions.com/forum/topics.aspx?ID=25295

http://welcome2solutions.com/forum/topics.aspx?ID=16085

http://welcome2solutions.com/forum/topics.aspx?ID=27841

http://forums.gentsgame.com/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=56381

http://forums.gentsgame.com/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=69992

http://forums.gentsgame.com/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=67625

http://forums.gentsgame.com/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=62636

http://forums.gentsgame.com/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=67624

http://forums.gentsgame.com/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=27572

http://forums.gentsgame.com/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=46637

http://forums.dangerousrays.com/viewtopic.php?t=53416

https://forums.dangerousrays.com/viewtopic.php?f=5&p=141527

http://forums.dangerousrays.com/viewtopic.php?t=41750

http://forums.dangerousrays.com/viewtopic.php?t=51636

For the most extreme categories, terrorist content and child pornography, online platforms had to react within an hour according to the law that was voted a couple of months ago. The Constitutional Council uses the same wording to rule that online platforms have to over-censor as they can’t base their moderation efforts on court rulings. Free speech again.

Given that the rest of the law is based on those two processes, it is no longer relevant. It included transparency on moderation processes and an appeal mechanism.

“The goal was to reach a difficult compromise between preserving free speech and enforcing the rule of law online. The government acknowledges the decision of the Constitutional Council — it believes the legal text in question can’t reach this objective in its current form,” the government said in a statement.

The government and deputy Laetitia Avia say they’ll now base further work on today’s ruling. In other words, they’re going back to the drawing board.

Germany has already passed similar regulation and there are ongoing discussions at the European Union level.

https://forums.dangerousrays.com/viewtopic.php?t=73735&p=142051

https://forums.dangerousrays.com/viewtopic.php?t=73736

https://forums.dangerousrays.com/viewtopic.php?t=73813

http://www.pulsar-club.com/index.php/topic,16900.0.html

http://www.pulsar-club.com/index.php/topic,6884.15.html

http://www.pulsar-club.com/index.php/topic,16797.0.html

http://www.pulsar-club.com/index.php/topic,16850.0.html

http://www.pulsar-club.com/index.php/topic,16898.0.html

http://theauctionboard.com/showthread.php?tid=231925

http://forums.thesignagedepot.com/showthread.php?tid=63126&pid=296919

http://modderbase.com/showthread.php?tid=1200

https://schoolangels.sonkotek.com/ke/showthread.php?tid=446