http://forums.thesignagedepot.com/showthread.php?tid=24964
https://salobby.000webhostapp.com/showthread.php?tid=16070
https://antialem.com/forum/showthread.php?tid=46517
https://mybbrawhunt.lupotech.com/showthread.php?tid=32297
https://ccitonline.com/forum/showthread.php?tid=1099
Microsoft and Amazon are at it again as the fight for the Defense Department JEDI contract continues. In a recent series of increasingly acerbic pronouncements, the two companies continue their ongoing spat over the $10 billion, decade-long JEDI contract spoils.
As you may recall (or not), last fall in a surprise move, the DoD selected Microsoft as the winning vendor in the JEDI winner-take-all cloud infrastructure sweepstakes. The presumed winner was always AWS, but when the answer finally came down, it was not them.
To make a very long story short, AWS took exception to the decision and went to court to fight it. Later it was granted a stay of JEDI activities between Microsoft and the DoD, which as you can imagine did not please Microsoft . Since then, the two companies have been battling in PR pronouncements and blog posts trying to get the upper hand in the war for public opinion.
That fight took a hard turn this week when the two companies really went at it in dueling blog posts after Amazon filed its latest protest.
First there was Microsoft with PR exec Frank Shaw taking exception to AWS’s machinations, claiming the company just wants a do-over:
https://ccitonline.com/forum/showthread.php?tid=1099
https://antialem.com/forum/showthread.php?tid=46517
https://mybbrawhunt.lupotech.com/showthread.php?tid=32297
https://salobby.000webhostapp.com/showthread.php?tid=16070
http://forums.thesignagedepot.com/showthread.php?tid=24964
https://qneuro.net/forum/showthread.php?tid=24207
https://forums.empressflyff.com/showthread.php?tid=39595
https://eumoneyforum.com/showthread.php?tid=5192
This latest filing – filed with the DoD this time – is another example of Amazon trying to bog down JEDI in complaints, litigation and other delays designed to force a do-over to rescue its failed bid.
Amazon’s Drew Herdner countered in a blog post published this morning:
Recently, Microsoft has published multiple self-righteous and pontificating blog posts that amount to nothing more than misleading noise intended to distract those following the protest.
The bottom line is that Microsoft believes it won the contract fair and square with a more competitive bid, while Amazon believes it should have won on technical superiority, and that there was political interference from the president because he doesn’t like Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos, who also owns the Washington Post.
https://forums.workpermitvisas.in/index.php?topic=172332.0
https://forums.workpermitvisas.in/index.php?topic=170931.0
https://forums.workpermitvisas.in/index.php?topic=170273.0
https://forum.btcpbrand.com/viewtopic.php?t=62119
https://forum.btcpbrand.com/viewtopic.php?t=60466
https://forum.btcpbrand.com/viewtopic.php?t=62154
https://forum.btcpbrand.com/viewtopic.php?t=73505
If you’ve been following this story from the beginning (as I have), you know it has taken a series of twists and turns. It’s had lawsuits, complaints, drama and intrigue. The president has inserted himself into it too. There have been accusations of conflicts of interest. There have been investigations, lawsuits, and more investigations.
Government procurement tends to be pretty bland, but from the start when the DoD chose to use the cutesy Star Wars-driven acronym for this project, it has been anything but. Now it’s come down to two of the world’s largest tech companies exchanging angry blog posts. Sooner or later this is going to end right?
https://salobby.000webhostapp.com/showthread.php?tid=16070
https://antialem.com/forum/showthread.php?tid=46517
https://mybbrawhunt.lupotech.com/showthread.php?tid=32297
https://ccitonline.com/forum/showthread.php?tid=1099
Microsoft and Amazon are at it again as the fight for the Defense Department JEDI contract continues. In a recent series of increasingly acerbic pronouncements, the two companies continue their ongoing spat over the $10 billion, decade-long JEDI contract spoils.
As you may recall (or not), last fall in a surprise move, the DoD selected Microsoft as the winning vendor in the JEDI winner-take-all cloud infrastructure sweepstakes. The presumed winner was always AWS, but when the answer finally came down, it was not them.
To make a very long story short, AWS took exception to the decision and went to court to fight it. Later it was granted a stay of JEDI activities between Microsoft and the DoD, which as you can imagine did not please Microsoft . Since then, the two companies have been battling in PR pronouncements and blog posts trying to get the upper hand in the war for public opinion.
That fight took a hard turn this week when the two companies really went at it in dueling blog posts after Amazon filed its latest protest.
First there was Microsoft with PR exec Frank Shaw taking exception to AWS’s machinations, claiming the company just wants a do-over:
https://ccitonline.com/forum/showthread.php?tid=1099
https://antialem.com/forum/showthread.php?tid=46517
https://mybbrawhunt.lupotech.com/showthread.php?tid=32297
https://salobby.000webhostapp.com/showthread.php?tid=16070
http://forums.thesignagedepot.com/showthread.php?tid=24964
https://qneuro.net/forum/showthread.php?tid=24207
https://forums.empressflyff.com/showthread.php?tid=39595
https://eumoneyforum.com/showthread.php?tid=5192
This latest filing – filed with the DoD this time – is another example of Amazon trying to bog down JEDI in complaints, litigation and other delays designed to force a do-over to rescue its failed bid.
Amazon’s Drew Herdner countered in a blog post published this morning:
Recently, Microsoft has published multiple self-righteous and pontificating blog posts that amount to nothing more than misleading noise intended to distract those following the protest.
The bottom line is that Microsoft believes it won the contract fair and square with a more competitive bid, while Amazon believes it should have won on technical superiority, and that there was political interference from the president because he doesn’t like Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos, who also owns the Washington Post.
https://forums.workpermitvisas.in/index.php?topic=172332.0
https://forums.workpermitvisas.in/index.php?topic=170931.0
https://forums.workpermitvisas.in/index.php?topic=170273.0
https://forum.btcpbrand.com/viewtopic.php?t=62119
https://forum.btcpbrand.com/viewtopic.php?t=60466
https://forum.btcpbrand.com/viewtopic.php?t=62154
https://forum.btcpbrand.com/viewtopic.php?t=73505
If you’ve been following this story from the beginning (as I have), you know it has taken a series of twists and turns. It’s had lawsuits, complaints, drama and intrigue. The president has inserted himself into it too. There have been accusations of conflicts of interest. There have been investigations, lawsuits, and more investigations.
Government procurement tends to be pretty bland, but from the start when the DoD chose to use the cutesy Star Wars-driven acronym for this project, it has been anything but. Now it’s come down to two of the world’s largest tech companies exchanging angry blog posts. Sooner or later this is going to end right?
Comments
Post a Comment